In this opinion piece, the retired colonel examines the latest signs of a serious armour shortage in the Russian army. The article has been corrected.Former tank commander Hamish de Bretton-Gordon OBE believes Putin and his generals have already lost if all they can do now is send pre–WW2 T34 tanks and 1950s T55 tanks to the frontline. Update: this article was accidentally edited to imply that infantry tanks typically had less effective armor. And while everything seems to be twice as big, the performance gains are often exponentially better: the main gun of the Challenger may be twice as wide in diameter but's many, many times more effective. The Challenger is superior in every way, from speed to cross-country performance. The difference between the two tanks in the video is huge. The Challenger 2 in the video has an extra layer of reactive armor on the side of the turret and hull, and cage-like " slat armor" surrounding the rear engine compartment-two upgrades that came about as a result of experience in the Iraq War. Armored protection is classified but is known to use so-called "Chobham armor", a mixture of ceramic and metal composites also used in earlier versions of the M1 Abrams tank. It speeds along at up to 37 miles an hour, more than twice as fast as the Churchill, and has more than double the horsepower to weight ratio.Ĭhallenger 2 is armed with a 120-millimeter rifled anti-tank gun and, like the Churchill, it has two smaller 7.62-millimeter machine guns for engaging infantry, anti-tank missile crews, and light vehicles. At 27 feet long and 65 tons, it's more than fifty percent heavier than its ancestor the Churchill. The Challenger 2 tank, which came into service in 1998, is the standard main battle tank of the British Army.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |